Tech News
Back to home
Technology

Uncle Sam wants to scan your iris and collect your DNA, citizen or not

Source

Hacker News

Published

TL;DR

AI Generated

The US Department of Homeland Security is proposing a significant expansion of biometric data collection for immigration applications, which would include immigrants and some US citizens associated with them. The rule suggests collecting biometric data from a wide range of individuals involved in immigration benefit requests, regardless of age or citizenship status. This expanded collection would encompass various biometric technologies like ocular imagery, voice prints, and DNA, allowing DHS to verify identities, relationships, and eligibility for benefits. The proposal has raised concerns about privacy, government overreach, and potential misuse of biometric data, with negative feedback from the public.

Read Full Article

Similar Articles

“Sensorveillance” Turns Ordinary Life Into Evidence

“Sensorveillance” Turns Ordinary Life Into Evidence

The article discusses the concept of "sensorveillance," where everyday devices inadvertently serve as sources of evidence for law enforcement. Author Andrew Guthrie Ferguson explores how consumer electronics and telecommunications devices have transformed into default informants for police investigations. The piece delves into the implications of this phenomenon on privacy and surveillance in daily life.

IEEE Spectrum•
MIT Technology Review

Is the Pentagon allowed to surveil Americans with AI?

The ongoing dispute between the Department of Defense and AI company Anthropic raises questions about the legality of the Pentagon conducting mass surveillance on Americans. OpenAI, a rival AI company, initially allowed the Pentagon to use its AI for "all lawful purposes," sparking concerns about domestic surveillance. However, OpenAI has since amended its contract to prevent its AI from being used for domestic surveillance. The use of AI in surveillance poses challenges as laws have not kept pace with technological advancements, allowing for extensive data collection on Americans without clear restrictions. Lawmakers are beginning to address these concerns, with Senator Ron Wyden seeking bipartisan support for legislation to address mass surveillance.

MIT Technology Review•
MIT Technology Review

Now is a good time for doing crime

The article discusses how advancements in technology create new opportunities for crime and ways to combat it. The author shares a personal experience of being hacked through social engineering tactics. Technology constantly evolves, leading to new vulnerabilities and tactics for criminals, while law enforcement adapts to leverage technology for investigations. The piece highlights the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between crime and law enforcement, emphasizing the need for updated security measures and surveillance to combat modern crimes effectively.

MIT Technology Review•
MIT Technology Review

Inside Chicago’s surveillance panopticon

The article discusses the extensive surveillance network in Chicago, including tens of thousands of cameras and technologies like ShotSpotter. While some believe this surveillance enhances public safety, others argue it creates a surveillance panopticon that infringes on privacy and free speech. Activists like Lucy Parsons Labs have pushed back against surveillance technologies, such as license plate readers, by filing FOIA requests and analyzing data to reveal disparities and inefficiencies. The article also highlights the work of individuals like Brian Strockis, who pioneered the use of drones in law enforcement, and Mark Wallace, who advocates against red-light and speed cameras in Chicago. Additionally, it mentions the legal challenges faced by individuals like Derick Scruggs, who was detained due to a ShotSpotter alert, leading to a settlement prohibiting such actions in the future.

MIT Technology Review•

We use cookies

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our cookie policy.